If an app isn’t developed firstly for the Western market, tech press suggests its success isn’t worth knowing about.

Handling of online abuse often leads to *further* oppression of marginalized voices.

What if we were able to harness technology independent of military and carceral dictation of the movement? How can we think about technologies in ways that would be helpful to women, not used as violence against us?

Blockchain's scorecard on diversity is no better than the rest of the tech world. In fact, it is arguably worse.

The anti-online harassment movement is already replicating many of the shortcomings, failures, erroneous assumptions and faulty strategies of the larger violence against women movement.

Many companies preach about diversity, but do nothing of substance to address their issues.

Attempts to get -- and keep -- more women in tech put the onus solely on women themselves… at tremendous time and cost.

The high visibility of indie success stories creates the illusion that commercial success is accessible and achievable by all, disregarding the challenges most indie developers face.

Who controls the machines? How are they made? And who makes them?

The overwhelming focus on imposter syndrome doesn’t provide a space to process the power dynamics affecting you; you get gaslighted into thinking it’s *you* causing all the problems.