Access to quality information, in addition to being a fundamental right, is what allows us to make consistent and informed decisions on the issues that affect us the most.

This is a feminist issue considering hackathon practices prevent the growth of a diverse, critical tech sphere.

Two poems about the ways I'm tokenized and asked to respond as a technical POC in the industry.

In an online survey I conducted, two-thirds of respondents thought depictions of female tech experts were “not particularly accurate” or even “very inaccurate”.

As more and more of our lives are played out in digital space, can we mitigate anxiety in the tools that we create and use everyday?

What does it mean for the future of AI when technology mirrors the sensibilities of a dominant group?

The overwhelming focus on imposter syndrome doesn’t provide a space to process the power dynamics affecting you; you get gaslighted into thinking it’s *you* causing all the problems.

Legitimacy as a programmer universally requires a stamp of approval from institutions with power and privilege over marginalized groups.

Punishing and irrelevant interview processes seek to produce disciplined high-tech employees, jumping through arbitrary hoops at the whims of employers.

Is it enough to be measured by the quality of our code alone?